Will We Still Need Smartphones in 2041?

In 2011, the smartphone still did not look like a device around which everyday life would be organized. Only 35% of U.S. adults owned one. By 2025, that figure had risen to 91%. In less than a decade and a half, one device absorbed the compact camera, music player, navigation unit, payments, tickets and part of the personal computer. Pew data captures how quickly that shift happened.

Now the smartphone faces a similar question: will we still need a separate rectangular screen in our pocket if the digital world moves into glasses, earbuds, watches and an always-available AI assistant?

ORBK.NET’s current estimate is that by September 30, 2041, a smartphone will still be regularly used by a majority of mobile-internet users worldwide. The probability is about 65%, with a working range of 55–70%. Confidence is 45/100.

The most likely answer today is yes: smartphones will still matter in 15 years. But we may touch them far less often. The phone could evolve from our primary digital window into a pocket-sized computing, communications and security hub while the main interface moves closer to our eyes, ears and voice.

The smartphone ecosystem is too large to disappear quickly

To understand the technology’s inertia, it is more useful to look at the installed ecosystem than at a single new pair of glasses. According to GSMA data, about 4.8 billion people — 59% of the world’s population — were using mobile internet by the end of 2025. GSMA’s latest detailed device estimate also showed roughly 4.4 billion people using their own smartphone to access mobile internet at the end of 2024.

Ericsson’s medium-term outlook is equally revealing. It estimated roughly 7.47 billion smartphone subscriptions in 2025 and projects about 8.49 billion by 2031. These are subscriptions rather than unique people, but the infrastructure scale is clear. In the Ericsson outlook, smartphones are still expected to generate almost all mobile data traffic in 2031.

So the first part of the road toward 2041 does not yet look like a smartphone retreat. Networks, payments, identity, cameras, messaging, services and local AI continue to concentrate around the device. A successor must do more than look futuristic: it must become cheap, reliable and universal enough for billions of people to move their digital lives onto it.

A possible successor is beginning to take shape

The strongest candidate today is smart glasses. In 2026, Google outlined two Android XR eyewear paths: audio-first glasses and display-equipped models able to place information in the user’s field of view. Proposed uses include navigation, messages, photography, calls and Gemini assistance without repeatedly taking a phone out of a pocket.

A smartphone rival no longer needs to be another small computer with a conventional screen. It can win by gradually taking away individual phone moments: checking a message, following a route, taking a photo, translating a sign, asking AI a question or answering a call.

The market remains small compared with smartphones, although it is growing quickly. IDC expects about 13.6 million shipments of display-less smart glasses in 2026 and roughly 27.3 million in 2030. Smartphone shipments, by contrast, still exceed one billion units a year. Glasses are no longer just a lab experiment, but they remain far from replacing the phone.

What could actually kill the smartphone?

The biggest threat is not a single glasses model but a combination of technologies maturing together. AI assistants can reduce the need to open apps manually. Today a trip may involve a calendar, maps, a ride-hailing service, messaging and a ticket. A future agent could understand the intent once and coordinate the whole sequence.

The interface is changing too. Voice works for commands and short answers, glasses can display information in the field of view, earbuds can maintain an ongoing conversation, and a watch or ring can provide identity and authentication. None of these devices replaces the smartphone on its own. Together, they can unbundle its functions.

That is the same mechanism the smartphone once used against cameras, MP3 players and GPS devices. The phone simply became good enough at all of those jobs. The smartphone becomes vulnerable when carrying a large screen in a pocket stops being useful because most daily interactions are easier elsewhere.

Why the pocket screen may be surprisingly durable

The strongest counterargument is practicality. A smartphone combines a large battery, strong camera, powerful processor, mobile connectivity, a private display and precise touch control. It remains convenient for reading a long document, reviewing photos, filling in a form, paying, showing a QR code or editing text.

Glasses still have to solve weight, battery life, heat, appearance, prescription lenses, camera privacy and social acceptance. Voice is awkward on public transport or in meetings. Information floating in front of the eyes is not always better than a normal screen, especially for longer text and detailed work.

There is also an economic barrier. In many countries, the smartphone is not an extra gadget but the person’s only personal computer. Technology generations do not turn over globally at the same pace: some people may be buying their first fully capable smartphone at the same time that wealthy markets are discussing a post-smartphone era.

What previous technology transitions suggest

There is no honest historical base rate for this event. Humanity has only once gone through a global transition from mobile phones to a smartphone ecosystem. Still, consumer-electronics history offers a useful mechanism: a new device can replace an old one quickly when it can do the old device’s main job while adding meaningful new capabilities.

That is why smartphones largely absorbed compact cameras and music players. Laptops, however, did not disappear after smartphones arrived because large screens, keyboards and higher productivity retained a distinct role.

The smartphone may follow the laptop’s path. Other devices may take a growing share of attention while the phone survives wherever its physical properties remain more useful. By 2041, “will we still carry a smartphone?” and “will we still spend our day looking at it?” may have very different answers.

Three scenarios through 2041

The first two scenarios satisfy the YES criterion, producing a central estimate of about 65%. The phone does not need to remain as dominant as it is today to survive. It only needs to retain several functions that other devices still struggle to combine.

What would change the forecast?

The estimate should rise if smart glasses are still a tens-of-millions market by 2030 while smartphones remain a billion-unit market; if glasses and other wearables still depend on the phone as a compute or communications hub; if AI makes the phone itself more useful; and if new display technologies remove some current form-factor limitations.

The estimate should fall materially if mass-market autonomous glasses appear between 2030 and 2035 with all-day use, display, camera, mobile connectivity, payments, authentication and AI without a phone; if annual sales reach hundreds of millions; and if smartphone engagement begins a structural decline even in middle-income markets.

The first major checkpoint is 2030. If glasses remain mostly an accessory by then, mass smartphone replacement by 2041 becomes much harder. A second major checkpoint comes in 2035, when it should be clearer whether a new universal personal interface has emerged or whether functions have simply been split between phones and wearables.

So will we still need smartphones in 15 years?

Most likely, yes. But “using a smartphone” may mean something very different. In 2041 a person may receive a briefing through an earbud, see directions in glasses, ask AI to book a trip by voice and pay with a watch while the phone stays in a pocket for most of the day.

It may still hold identity credentials, run powerful local AI, provide the mobile connection, synchronize other devices and offer a large general-purpose screen when voice and glasses are not enough.

That would not look like a smartphone victory, but it would not be its death either. Fifteen years from now, the phone may stop being the object around which our attention revolves while remaining the device around which the rest of the personal digital system quietly works.

Forecast card

Forecast disclaimer: This forecast does not claim that the event will occur. It is a current probability estimate based on information available at the time of the forecast and may change as new information appears.